Design thinking is essential for effective solutions

Design thinking is essential for effective solutions is Patrick (Pat) Lamb’s first post on Dialogue. In the last 20+ years we have witnessed Pat’s NewLaw journey, most recently integrating his law firm into Elevate.

Coyle began his response by reversing the question to “how is design thinking related to innovation?” I thought that was insightful, but my appreciation for his answer ended there. Coyle defined design thinking as “a process and a mindset used to solve complex problems in unique and innovative ways.” In other words, uniqueness and innovation are inherent attributes of design thinking. I see design thinking a bit differently.

Read More

Lawyers should be playing in the sandbox

In 2017 The Law Society of England & Wales published Capturing Technological Innovation in Legal Services. The report provides an ’empowering narrative and practical examples to move legal tech beyond ideas and innovation for innovation’s sake’. But IMO it has not received the worldwide attention it deserves.

Written by Lisa Culbert who is a Canadian in-house counsel and a member of the Law Made team, this post captures the important highlights of the The Law Society’s report. Lawyers should be playing in the sandbox is published on Dialogue under Jason Moyse’s name, co-founder of Law Made and one of our Contributors.

It’s written in non-geek language and is ideally suited to any lawyer wondering what legaltech is all about?  

A sandbox for lawyers? Time to play? These are far cries from the legacy, the tradition and the conservatism expected from the legal profession.


However, that’s precisely what can be gleaned from from the Law Society of England and Wales’ Report published early in 2017. The report provides a refreshing take on the status of legal technology and its growing list of innovative offerings for lawyers and their clients with non-prescriptive examples of how legal technology has been both explored and deployed in practice.

The pace of change in legal services is not slowing down while lawyers’ day-to-day practice of law continues to lag far behind, especially when it comes to adoption or implementation but even when (and this is where the real point of struggle is) it comes to experimentation and trying, iterating and improving. An agile, project-based method to legal services and the way lawyers practice law is still a foreign and faraway concept to most. It goes against the conventional lawyer DNA of “Type A” perfectionism as well as the law firm partnership model of groupthink and slow-to-move approaches to change.

The report reminds readers (particularly the lawyers and firms toying with innovative ideas) that the goal is not perfection or finding a panacea to move legal services into the new era, but instead it’s about exploration and efforts to test and to try.  The report illustrates how a sandbox for lawyers as a platform for exploration, testing and trying can actually enhance diligence, professionalism and the client-centric provision of legal services.

The Research

The Law Society of England & Wales conducted in-depth desk research, online surveys and discussions (with its Insights Community), qualitative interviews with legal solution suppliers, legal technology and finance start-ups and leaders in law firms (from heads of Innovation/Technology, Senior Partners and CEOs). Through these sources, their accounts and experiences, we’re left with first-hand, real-life evidence that it is not only possible, but necessary, to start playing and exploring the implementation of new technology and tools as a pathway to achieving legal innovation.

Summary and Highlights

Bourns’ forward to the report emphasizes that while the role of lawyers’ and expectations of professionalism haven’t changed, the way we do our roles – the processes and tools has.


Trending within each of these areas and demonstrated throughout the report with visual, diagrammatic and infographic examples are:

  • Process automation, machine learning and AI
  • Data security and the cloud
  • External partnerships, ecosystems and distributed assets
  • Legal project management

The Need for (Product) Makers


Legal services now extend beyond the conventional “services” and are appropriately characterized as “products” with the impact of legal technology in this transition seen in the Report’s highlights and case study examples. RAVN (and its LONald tool for real estate documents; ACE for due diligence contract reviews) and Etro (by LexMachina for patent application prediction) among other AI, machine learning and predictive analytics are great examples. Then there is the chatbots and advice apps ranging from the uber-successful tool that allows individuals to challenge their parking tickets and the AskaLawyer Q&A sites like RocketLawyer and mobile (available on the App Store), on-the-go advice options.

Not only are legal services now productized, but they are also available through new processes ranging from automation and outsourcing alternatives like Robotic Process Automation (which as Andrew Burgess has explained in his role as an advisor to automation consultancy, Symphony Ventures) shaves the cost of outsourcing off-shore with the use of robots) to pricing models extending beyond conventional ABS and fixed fees to legal spend, smart dashboards in real-time, pricing menus and pay-as-you-go options.

Innovation Disconnect

The Report highlights the disconnect within the lawyer and law firm process of innovation as we’ve gotten really good at identifying and incubating new ideas and tools without actual implementation or integration of them in practice. The reason for the disconnect seems to be a failure to align innovation within the business vision AND the strategic vision. Traditionally innovation within these two visions can be seen as competing which keeps innovation in its idea stage. Alignment can assist to move the idea past this standstill and roll it into a sandbox, where it can actually be tried and explored. The concept of the sandbox as the first stop in the new legal playground is identified in “The 3 boxes of innovation” model of Ryan McClead to help facilitate business transformation. Lawyers can look to other industries for what has worked and what hasn’t. We use precedents and samples all the time to draft agreements and structure deals, so why not apply the same process (albeit in a more playful and experimental way) to implementing ideas and innovations?

Makes sense right? Lawyers like knowing what works and what doesn’t. We recognize that the landscape of rules and regulations and innovation for that matter, is ever-changing. To help us navigate the concept of exploration then, the Report (and its authors for that matter) recognize the role they — the Law Society, can play in providing opportunities to “play” by identifying new tools, planning and benchmarking activities. Their “Practical Guide to Innovating” sets out a list of questions for lawyers’ and firms’ own internal assessment for them to tailor the process of (finally) creating the necessary alignment for innovation between their business and strategic visions.


Capturing Technological Innovation in Legal Services is much more than a summary report of the latest and greatest in legal tech. It’s value is not in the identification of opportunities for innovation but in the illustration of their implementation with testimonials, reflections and experiences from those who are starting to move past ideas to implementation –  clients, firms, corporates and recipients of legal services and the suppliers and start-ups building out their product and services suites.

An empowering read for those who are ready to get off the bench and start playing. A sandbox is waiting.

Lawyers should be playing in the sandbox was first published on the Law Made blog by Lisa Culbert and Jason Moyse.

Related content on Dialogue

Read More

The lawyer from Wagga Wagga in a three-piece suit

The lawyer from Wagga Wagga in a three-piece suit tells a story that gives me confidence the legal profession will (eventually) re-invent the way it serves the public in the interests of access to justice and democracy.

Read More

Remaking News of the Week: Baker Mckenzie nears $3b

In Remaking News of the Week: Baker Mckenzie nears $3b I am pleased to reference Conventus Leadership, a leading source of analysis, facts, opinion and news on legal services in the Asia-Pacific. Conventus reports geographically-dispersed Baker McKenzie is nearing $3b in the year-ended ended 2018. In USD, this represents year-on-year growth of 8%.

Read More

Why everyone should read Legal Upheaval

Today’s headline on Dialogue, Why everyone should read Legal Upheaval, is a rhetorical statement emphasising my message and challenging readers to take action.

Michele DeStefano wrote Legal Upheaval: A Guide to Creativity, Collaboration and Innovation in Law to inspire practising lawyers to innovate, irrespective of how comfortable and successful they feel. In this she succeeds admirably. Here’s why…  

Read More

Innovation and operations in legal services

Catherine’s contribution on Innovation and operations in legal services deserves wide readership because of its focus on collaboration and co-creation and reporting on the SOLID conference last month. 

Innovation in legal services is a team sport in an ever-growing league, with a terrific roster of players, coaches, owners, scouts, and commentators. Yet we don’t compete; we share and collaborate. The Cowen Group’s Summit on Legal Innovation and Disruption (SOLID) has become an energetic gathering for counsel to stay at the top of their game.

Read More